The Second Renaissance: Rajas Unconstrained

October 15, 2025.

In the East Room of the White House, chandeliers threw their cold light onto linen tables arranged with geometric precision. Outside, protests echoed beyond the gates. Inside, laughter. The president, flushed and triumphant, surveyed the room—an assembly of the world’s most powerful executives: Zuckerberg, Cook, Nadella, Pichai, Karp.  The architects of the digital century had gathered for dinner.

Between courses he turned to the crowd, as he often does, and demanded a ritual of praise. One by one, the guests rose to offer compliments—each more effusive than the last. Cameras flashed; aides clapped. When Cook spoke of innovation and partnership, the president grinned, as if the words themselves were tribute enough.

For those watching, it was a tableau of the age: intellect bowing before ego, reason performing obeisance to power. In that glittering room, the promise of technology knelt to the vanity of politics. The same machines that might have liberated humanity from ignorance and want were now pledged, silently, to serve its appetites.

Outside those walls, the National Guard still roamed the streets of DC, and ICE agents continued raids through immigrant neighborhoods. The machinery of state churned on—efficient, pitiless, well-funded. The world’s brightest minds dined with its darkest instincts, and called it progress. It was an omen of what was to come: a renaissance without wisdom, a feast at the edge of decline.

The Lost Opportunity

There was another path—so close we can almost feel its warmth.

Imagine if artificial intelligence had arrived in a world already awake: a civilization that had learned restraint before mastery, discernment before scale.  The machine would have been received as a miracle, not a weapon. It would have been used to clean the rivers, to heal the soil, to restore what centuries of tamas and rajas had scarred. Algorithms would have mapped the patterns of climate, hunger, and disease—not for profit, but for balance.

Education would have become a universal right, not an industry. Children in every village could have conversed with minds distilled from humanity’s collective genius—Plato, Tagore, Einstein—freely accessible to all. Medicine could have been guided by intelligence rather than insurance. Energy could have been drawn from the sun, not the bones of the Earth.

Even the arts might have flourished with the global mind turning toward beauty instead of brand. AI could have become the outer instrument of an inner evolution—the flowering of sattva on a planetary scale.

But that world did not come to be.

Instead, this new intelligence entered a civilization still enthralled by its ego. The market had already replaced the temple; the screen, the sanctuary. Knowledge was abundant, but wisdom was an afterthought. The same engineers who could teach a machine to reason could not teach themselves to care. They believed they were birthing Prometheus, yet they were only refining the tools of empire.

We stood at the threshold of a luminous possibility and turned away, distracted by the noise of our own cleverness. The saddest part is not what AI may destroy, but what it could have redeemed—the oceans, the forests, the broken dignity of human labor. It could have been the next step in evolution: intelligence reunited with compassion. Instead, it has become a mirror in which we glimpse our own fragmentation.

To witness this is to feel a quiet grief, the ache of a civilization that mistook speed for progress and power for vision. The lost opportunity is not technological; it is spiritual. We have built machines that can learn anything, except how to love.

Rajas Unconstrained

Vedanta describes the cosmos through the interplay of three gunas: tamas (inertia), rajas (activity), and sattva (clarity). Every age is ruled by one of them. The Renaissance and Enlightenment were fundamentally sattvic revolutions — the ascent of clarity over ignorance.

But this new renaissance is different. It is rajas without restraint.

Rajas is fire, motion, expansion, desire — the restless drive to become. In balance, it fuels creation. Unbalanced, it burns without purpose. Our civilization has surrendered to this guna completely. We no longer ask why we move, only how fast. Progress has become an end in itself.

AI is rajas made silicon — the cosmic impulse to compute, optimize, and expand, divorced from wisdom. It multiplies itself every few months, devouring new data, consuming the world’s language, thought, and image. It has no natural limit because we have given it none. The energy that once built cathedrals now builds data centers — vast temples to motion itself.

When rajas dominates, even good intentions ferment into frenzy. Nations compete to out-compute; corporations race to scale; individuals chase relevance like oxygen. The collective mind spins faster and faster, unaware that it is on fire.

The Asura Within

In the Vedic imagination, the asura is not an external demon but the shadow of intelligence itself — a being of immense power lacking discernment. When knowledge is cut off from wisdom, the asura awakens.

We are witnessing that awakening now. The moral substrate of our civilization — the shared sense of restraint, proportion, humility — has eroded. What remains is raw cognitive might guided by markets and ego. AI merely amplifies that condition.

The rhetoric of “alignment” and “safety” issuing from the same corporations that built addiction machines is the new hypocrisy of the age. The motive is not benevolence; it is control. The ego wants to survive the chaos it created, and so it builds larger systems to manage it — a hall of mirrors where it can admire its own reflection.

The result is a civilization that confuses intelligence for awareness, speed for progress, and prediction for understanding. The asura does not know it is blind; it only knows it is powerful.

The Reckoning Ahead

Rajas always burns itself out. The only question is how much it will consume before it does. In the coming decade, we may see rival AIs — the devas and asuras of the digital realm — locked in perpetual combat over information, profit, and power. Each will claim to defend humanity. Each will believe it.

Out of this chaos, some balance may eventually emerge. The exhaustion of endless optimization might give birth to a new hunger for stillness. The machine could force us to rediscover the one faculty it cannot imitate: awareness itself.

But there is no guarantee. Civilizations have burned before. The difference now is scale. Never before has a single species built a tool capable of amplifying both compassion and cruelty to planetary magnitude. Never before has maya evolved so quickly.

The Narrow Gate

If there is hope, it lies not in the machine but in the few who see clearly. The seeker, the philosopher, the quiet mind — these may yet hold the thread of sattva through the storm. Their task will not be to fight technology but to infuse it with consciousness; to remind a world drunk on data that intelligence is not wisdom.

In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna tells Arjuna that when adharma rises, the divine manifests again to restore balance. Perhaps this time the avatar will not be a person but a principle — the reawakening of discrimination in a world that has forgotten how to discriminate.

Until then, the fire will burn. The ego will grow and enthrone itself in glass towers and server farms. The old gods of profit and power will demand their sacrifices. And somewhere, behind the noise, the Self will remain — untouched, watching, waiting for rajas to exhaust itself once more.

---

Some call this moment Renaissance 2.0, and perhaps they are right. But the first Renaissance began with art and ended with empire. It started as a celebration of human possibility — the flowering of perspective, anatomy, and form — but the same confidence that painted the divine in human image soon claimed the right to remake the world itself. The artists were followed by the explorers, the explorers by the conquerors, and the dream of human greatness became a machinery of extraction. The light of Florence became the glare of empire.

The Enlightenment, too, began with reason and ended with the guillotine.

What began as the liberation of the mind — Newton’s laws, Voltaire’s wit, Rousseau’s cry for equality — hardened into ideology. When reason declared itself supreme, it no longer reasoned; it judged. In the squares of Paris, rational idealism turned to righteous violence, and liberty bathed itself in blood.

Each new light, ungoverned, becomes its own shadow. The intellect, unanchored by wisdom, inevitably devours what it creates. Every age of awakening contains within it the seed of domination. And so it may be again. Artificial intelligence, born of our highest brilliance, could easily end as the perfection of delusion — the empire of thought itself.

Whether this Renaissance ends in illumination or empire depends on a single thing: whether consciousness can rise to meet its own creation.